taowen

For nosql data storage, there is one thing not being talked about very much. That is migration. Typical answer to this is, for nosql database, there is no schema. So, there is no need to migrate the data. But this is a lie, although the database do not need a schema to store data, that does not mean data itself do not have structure.

Nosql claims to be very flexible so that semi-structure data can be stored. But if we use SQLServer as nosql database to persist objects, then the data itself must be structured. If we change the class definition, then the data can not be de-serialized, unless we migrate the data to match the new class definition.

The first typical response, no schema no migration does not work. The second typical response is backward compatible. The idea is, let the application code able to handle the data with older version. This might work, if the data structure (especially the inter-references between the objects) is simple, and the format application code consume is not strict (De-serialization according to class definition is a extremely strict). Also, the more older version need to be compatible, the more complex the application code would be. So, this approach is not pervasive and scalable.

The third response is, add a hook to the persistence layer. Before loading the data for use, check the version of the data. If the version is older, then execute a special transformation to upgrade the data into a newer version, so that the application code can be orthogonal with data migration logic. It seems very optimal, but actually not that easy to implement in practice.

The fourth response is, do a full data migration just like traditional RDBMS data migration. Load all the data out, transform them and save them back.

For object persistence, only approach 3 and 4 would work. And we tried them both, and got lots of surprisingly experiences. In next post, we will look into them in-depth, and see what will work, what work well, and what seems good solution actually costs a lot.

# posted by taowen @ 21:23 2 Comments